SquirrleyMojo:

Bet You Thought I'd Never Write Here

Sunday, April 24, 2005

And What About Bloggers?

E-mails 'hurt IQ more than pot'Friday, April 22, 2005 Posted: 8:08 AM EDT (1208 GMT) CNN Website

Half of workers respond to an e-mail within an hour, survey found.

LONDON, England -- Workers distracted by phone calls, e-mails and text messages suffer a greater loss of IQ than a person smoking marijuana, a British study shows.

The constant interruptions reduce productivity and leave people feeling tired and lethargic, according to a survey carried out by TNS Research and commissioned by Hewlett Packard.

The survey of 1,100 Britons showed:

Almost two out three people check their electronic messages out of office hours and when on holiday

Half of all workers respond to an e-mail within 60 minutes of receiving one

One in five will break off from a business or social engagement to respond to a message.

Nine out of 10 people thought colleagues who answered messages during face-to-face meetings were rude, while three out of 10 believed it was not only acceptable, but a sign of diligence and efficiency.

But the mental impact of trying to balance a steady inflow of messages with getting on with normal work took its toll, the UK's Press Association reported.

In 80 clinical trials, Dr. Glenn Wilson, a psychiatrist at King's College London University, monitored the IQ of workers throughout the day.

He found the IQ of those who tried to juggle messages and work fell by 10 points -- the equivalent to missing a whole night's sleep and more than double the 4-point fall seen after smoking marijuana.

"This is a very real and widespread phenomenon," Wilson said. "We have found that this obsession with looking at messages, if unchecked, will damage a worker's performance by reducing their mental sharpness.

"Companies should encourage a more balanced and appropriate way of working."

Wilson said the IQ drop was even more significant in the men who took part in the tests.

"The research suggests that we are in danger of being caught up in a 24-hour 'always on' society," said David Smith of Hewlett Packard.

"This is more worrying when you consider the potential impairment on performance and concentration for workers, and the consequent impact on businesses."

8 Comments:

At 12:04 PM, Blogger Stacy The Peanut Queen said...

Never would've thought it!

 
At 12:55 PM, Blogger MC Etcher said...

Is 'IQ' really the correct term for use in the news story?

Wouldn't 'loss of focus' or 'attention span' have been better?

And isn't IQ bunk anyway? It's region-centric, culture-centric, etc.

I once answered an IQ question for my psyche professor:

Q: "You're in a town in the middle of nowhere. You really need a haircut. There's a barber shop with two barbers.

One barber has a nice, neat haircut and the other has a terrible, choppy haircut.

Which barber do you ask to cut your hair?"

A: I said "The one with the neat haircut."

And that was the 'wrong' answer, because Obviously, they cut each other's hair.

Hmn. What if they cut their own hair? A mirror, some clippers, no?

Or maybe the well-groomed guy drives 200 miles to the nearest town, where a good barber cuts his hair?

I don't approve of questions and answers that say I'm 'wrong' because of assumed information.

But I digress.

 
At 3:35 PM, Blogger Happy and Blue 2 said...

Me no beleve study bout this. Must anser message now..

 
At 3:46 PM, Blogger The Smoker said...

Companies could always institute E-Mail Delivery Times, where they hold the e-mails until certain times, like, 9am, 12pm, and 3pm. Then they pass it along to the recipient then. That way, you can have specifically alloted times to read/answer them, which will allow people to not have to multi-task, constantly.

A lot of people would bitch and moan about this, but I think that e-mails are rarely such an emergency that they can't have a maximum 3 hour delay. You could even shorten the time increments to 2 hours, or whatever increment worked best, dependent on the nature of the work being done.

 
At 3:55 PM, Blogger SquirrleyMojo said...

Fabulous response Mike-o-man! Yes, I think I've said fabulous a total of 56 times today . . .

 
At 3:56 PM, Blogger SquirrleyMojo said...

D*mn IQs.

I mean really! Another system of oppression! I'd cut my own hair!

 
At 3:58 PM, Blogger SquirrleyMojo said...

Good luck Dark Q w/your new site--I morn the day I told a few friends too--

although, I'm pretty sure none of them read me! ha! they get enough of me in person!

 
At 3:59 PM, Blogger SquirrleyMojo said...

blue--you so funnie. reallie.

smoker--all good ideas. is there anyone you can contact??

 

Post a Comment

<< Home